<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome Launched Today: Design and UI Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.designartculture.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-launched-today-design-and-ui-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.designartculture.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-launched-today-design-and-ui-review/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:02:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Mindiola III</title>
		<link>http://www.designartculture.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-launched-today-design-and-ui-review/comment-page-1/#comment-885</link>
		<dc:creator>John Mindiola III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 11:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designartculture.com/?p=152#comment-885</guid>
		<description>Oh boy. Um, I&#039;m not a fan at all of the Google aesthetic. I mean, yes, I Google everything under the sun, but damn their stuff is ugly. This Chrome browser had me desiring Firefox&#039;s soft, smooth tans and silvers more than ever before. Some of these features are nice, like the disappearing status bar, but is it really that great? I think you have to ask yourself what&#039;s better: more of the site viewable, but with items appearing and disappearing all the time, or less of the site viewable, but knowing that that view is uninterrupted. I&#039;d take the latter every time.

The fact that you compared the Chrome browser to the iPod is atrocious. I know that on the web, usability and speed reign, but I&#039;ll take slightly slower loading times if it&#039;s easier to look at and more intuitively similar to the rest of the apps I&#039;m running. Okay, this is all just my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh boy. Um, I&#8217;m not a fan at all of the Google aesthetic. I mean, yes, I Google everything under the sun, but damn their stuff is ugly. This Chrome browser had me desiring Firefox&#8217;s soft, smooth tans and silvers more than ever before. Some of these features are nice, like the disappearing status bar, but is it really that great? I think you have to ask yourself what&#8217;s better: more of the site viewable, but with items appearing and disappearing all the time, or less of the site viewable, but knowing that that view is uninterrupted. I&#8217;d take the latter every time.</p>
<p>The fact that you compared the Chrome browser to the iPod is atrocious. I know that on the web, usability and speed reign, but I&#8217;ll take slightly slower loading times if it&#8217;s easier to look at and more intuitively similar to the rest of the apps I&#8217;m running. Okay, this is all just my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

